Peer Review Process
Ensuring quality and integrity through rigorous evaluation
Our Review Methodology
We employ a double-blind peer review process to ensure impartial evaluation and maintain the highest standards of academic integrity.
Submission & Initial Screening
Manuscripts are checked for completeness, formatting, and scope alignment. Papers that don't meet basic requirements are returned to authors.
Editor Assignment
An editor with relevant expertise is assigned to manage the review process and select appropriate reviewers.
Double-Blind Review
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript anonymously, assessing originality, methodology, significance, and clarity.
Decision & Feedback
The editor makes a decision based on reviewer recommendations and provides comprehensive feedback to authors.
Revision & Resubmission
Authors address reviewer comments and resubmit their revised manuscript for final evaluation.
Final Acceptance & Publication
Accepted manuscripts undergo final formatting checks and are scheduled for publication.
Review Quality Standards
Constructive Feedback
Reviewers provide detailed, constructive comments to help authors improve their work
Confidentiality
All submissions are treated as confidential documents during the review process
Timeliness
We maintain strict timelines to ensure timely decisions for all submissions